Search for: "LEE v. STATE"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 5,083
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2014, 1:45 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:20 am
The relevant distinction would presumably be congressionalists v. presidentialists, and I wonder how many of the Balkinization regulars are truly happy with the status quo. [read post]
9 May 2009, 6:00 am
Novak 90,000 170,000 0 260,000 Lee R. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 8:47 am
Additional Resources: Lee v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:33 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
The case of Conrad v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am
Lee, 15-789, is a state-on-top habeas case out of the you-know-where Circuit (no, not that one; cut it out already!). [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220 (1882)). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
” At Forbes, George Leef weighs in on Horne v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
Looking to Coleman v Tennessee and Lee v Madigan, Wilkinson further argued that statutes should be read against granting military jurisdiction in criminal cases, particularly capital cases, and that no such intention should be ascribed to Congress without clear and direct language to that effect. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
” The last decision on Friday was in Lee v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am
Lee, 154 N.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am
Lee, 154 N.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat) … [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
Lee Optical and McGowan v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:05 am
Lee Optical and McGowan v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm
Supreme Court holds that states lack standing to challenge immigration prioritization guidelines. _____________________________________________________________________ With Its Student Loan Decision, the Court Again Limits Agency Authority July 20, 2023 | Kate Shaw, Cardozo Law School, and Crawford Schneider, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School In Biden v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:04 am
Lee was the prime mover and (I believe) the draftsperson of the white paper. [read post]
