Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 3501 - 3520 of 21,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2015, 9:42 am by Bryant Walker Smith
Although automation will certainly impact civil liability in both theory and practice, merely asking “who is liable in tomorrow’s automated crashes” in the abstract is like asking “who is liable in today’s conventional crashes. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:39 am by Rick Davis & Associates
Thus, if a connection exists between a defendants job duties and the allegedly tortious conduct, the defendant was acting in the scope of his or her employment. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   The court stated that, as automobile accidents are specific events, a burden is placed upon the injured party to determine whether the other parties involved in the accident might be liable for any potential injuries.The court found that an argument of fraudulent concealment did not apply in this matter because, even if the Defendants had refused to respond to the Plaintiff’s inquiries, the Defendants did nothing to cause the Plaintiff to relax… [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:08 am by Berniard Law Firm
The court ruled that Hicks, the vehicle’s owner, was not liable for the damages caused by an unknown thief who stole his truck and crashed it into Blanchard’s police car. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 5:07 am by Jeff DeFrancisco
Here, the plaintiff offered the expert affirmation of an orthopedic surgeon, who refuted the defendants’ expert’s allegations by setting forth the various ways in which the defendants departed from the standard of care and linking such acts and omissions to the plaintiff’s harm. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 3:24 am by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
Specifically, the notice asserted that the defendant failed to diagnose the plaintiff’s decedent’s colon cancer, which subsequently spread throughout her body and caused her death. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:36 am by Nassiri Law
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., the court stated that defendants operating agreement was brilliantly crafted to hire employees under the guise of calling them independent contractors Further citing the California Court of Appeal, the court held that defendants conduct spoke even louder than their words as it exercised what amounted to total control over every aspect of drivers’ work. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:21 am
We are satisfied that the trial judge properly denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, which sought a determination that he was not liable to the Visakays in the underlying action as a matter of law because of the corporate shield doctrine. [read post]
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that the Equal Credit Opportunity Act does not preempt New Jersey’s common-law doctrine of necessaries whereby a spouse is jointly liable for necessary expenses incurred by the other spouse. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 6:33 am by Steven Cohen
  The plaintiff’s allege that the defendants were liable for the shooting death of their twenty-three ear old son. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:34 pm
Massachusetts's civil court system gives the family members of the victim the opportunity to present their complaint before a jury that then deliberates over whether the defendant(s) should pay the plaintiff(s) Massachusetts wrongful death compensation. [read post]