Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 70,944
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2013, 11:25 am
Vincent Marks testified for the defense in the New Hampshire murder trial against Jodi LaClaire. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:10 pm
“West Virginia’s Absurd, Dangerous Supreme Court Impeachment Crisis; The case just went to . . . the West Virginia Supreme Court, where every justice is either disqualified from hearing it or has been suspended without pay”: Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 6:54 pm
" Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball have this web exclusive online at Newsweek. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 6:14 am
The Colorado native and Donald Trump pick must help settle debates that include a Lakewood case about a same-sex wedding cake": Mark K. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 11:10 am
"Free speech cases at top of Supreme Court's agenda": Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 4:13 am
" The Board disagreed: "even if we were to find that Petitioner has established a prima facie case of abandonment, and we do not, Respondent has adequately shown that it has not abandoned use of its mark, as registered. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
The appeals court found that the TTAB made several significant errors and thus vacated and remanded the case. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:00 am
” The case was decided by the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:00 am
” The case was decided by the U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
The appeals court found that the TTAB made several significant errors and thus vacated and remanded the case. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 3:30 am
This case was not your typical “cola war”, but rather involved TWIST, the well-known carbonated beverage brand which has been available in South Africa since the 1970s (originally as LEMON TWIST). [read post]
12 May 2016, 10:46 am
Like Paul, I read with interest -- and, in my own case, I was both provoked and taken aback by -- Mark Tushnet's recent post at Balkinization on "abandoning defensive crouch liberal constitutionalism. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 8:12 am
The court denied the motion and the case proceeded to trial.But after trial, Marks’ counsel renewed that motion and, this time, the government’s opposition indicated that the government had extended a 20-year offer before trial. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:29 am
In this case, the court considers that there is diversity of forms relating to the chairs. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
A one-line conclusion is all we end up with in the Louboutin red sole sagaChristian Louboutin v Van Haren Schoenen BV Case C‑163/16, CJEU (June 2018)This case looking at the nature of Louboutin’s attempt to protect the red sole of its famous footwear has been much discussed and debated amongst trade mark lawyers in its nine-year history. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
Dealbook reports: The Securities and Exchange Commission is not backing down from its insider trading case against Mark Cuban, the entrepreneur turned professional basketball team owner. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:58 pm
In the typical reverse confusion case, the senior user can stop the junior user from using the mark. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 9:15 am
Judge Marks listed the issues at Kingston Crown Court as he began his summing up in the cases of six journalists employed by the best-selling newspaper. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
In that regard, for the purposes of determining whether a reputation exists within the meaning of Article 4(3), the principles laid down in case-law in respect of the requirement to show genuine use of a trade mark are not relevant. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 1:35 am
Furthermore, the intervener, before the Cancellation Division, did also not refer to the lack of distinctive character of the contested mark or the corresponding provision, but claimed solely that the contested mark was deceptive and had been registered in bad faith.It is settled case law that pleas must be interpreted in terms of their substance rather than of their classification (Torrefazione Caffè Michele Battista v EUIPO (T-221/18) EU:T:2019:382). [read post]
