Search for: "Matter of Bright"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 5,383
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2013, 8:44 am
But for the event that the Federal Circuit accepts Google's invitation to address these broader issues, Microsoft says "the positions [Google's] Motorola asks the Court to adopt are wrong as a legal matter and terrible as a policy matter". [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 12:00 pm
It said, among other things: There is a bright line between DISH and SoftBank: DISH is not foreign-controlled, nor is its proposal subject to CFIUS. . . . [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 4:13 am
He indicated that, while the question does not lend itself to a "bright line" test, in-house legal counsel should be in the best position to make the determination and control the vetting process. [read post]
28 May 2013, 2:48 pm
Let's assume for the sake of the argument that there is no bright line. [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:20 am
Who knows, maybe she is not that bright and took a similar approach to getting hired? [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:40 am
The family has not indicated at this point whether they plan to file civil litigation in this matter. [read post]
24 May 2013, 1:00 pm
This time, however, Safeway won below, getting the class decertified, and so is the respondent in the Court of Appeal.No matter. [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Supp. 2d 47 (D.D.C. 2011), I believe the court got it right in adopting a bright-line test. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:12 am
Supp. 2d 47 (D.D.C. 2011), I believe the court got it right in adopting a bright-line test. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:00 am
Because performance standards are bright lines, we’d like to see more courts adopt this boundary for the definition of parallel claims.The plaintiff’s purported parallel claim also failed from the opposite direction – from the state law side. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:07 am
It’s only a matter of time before they market employment timeshares. [read post]
19 May 2013, 10:26 pm
That eliminates the kind of difficult line-drawing that requires discretionary decisionmaking by low-level functionaries and instead provides a workable bright-line rule that politicking requires disclosure. [read post]
14 May 2013, 1:25 pm
The absence of a bright-line test is somewhat problematic. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:08 pm
They do not, at first blush, simplify matters. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:39 am
Judge Rader's opinion makes the following points: Court created subject matter exceptions: The claims are the key to the patent eligibility inquiry into the subject matter exclusions of abstract ideas, laws of nature and natural phenomena and abstract ideas. [read post]
13 May 2013, 10:34 am
This has me torn on how to handle the matter. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:20 am
Standing alone, that abstract idea is not patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:00 am
Some changes you liked and some you didn’t, but what matters with mistakes is what we learn. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:37 pm
Active Area (where the main subject matter is placed) vs. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:22 pm
Where the political line is drawn of course, regarding an essentially political statute, is a matter for Canadian voters to decide. [read post]
