Search for: "People v J."
Results 3501 - 3520
of 7,244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Jones v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
California v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 9:53 am
Leonard v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
" Dowling v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:46 am
But you know what’s even worse than lying to people to sell them shit, or in this case fiber and calcium, which will make them shit? [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 4:15 pm
In Daboll v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Where a class of potential claimants is excluded from those rights, the court is entitled to inquire into the reasons for the exclusion, and ask whether it serves any legitimate purpose, or leads to results “so anomalous as to render the legislation unacceptable” (J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 45, para 83).There was no clear basis for the 3 year limit in the contemporary material. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm
Fischbein (3d Cir. 2001) (Alito, J.). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Where a class of potential claimants is excluded from those rights, the court is entitled to inquire into the reasons for the exclusion, and ask whether it serves any legitimate purpose, or leads to results “so anomalous as to render the legislation unacceptable” (J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 45, para 83).There was no clear basis for the 3 year limit in the contemporary material. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:54 pm
Bank v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
Rather than following Chevron v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
The People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 2:48 am
Justice Joseph Quinn's November 29, 2010 ruling in Bruni v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 8:09 am
Nuddleman of Phillip J. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:15 am
From Motown Record Co., LP v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm
For example, in the case involving a photograph of J K Rowling’s child taken in the street, Patten J said “if the law is such as to give every adult or child a legitimate expectation of not being photographed without consent on any occasion on which they are not, so to speak, on public business then it will have created a right for most people to the protection of their image” (see Murray v Big Pictures [2007] EWHC 1908 (Ch), [65]). [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
I recently spoke with Henry J. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
Canada In the case of The College of Pharmacists of Manitoba v Jorgenson 2019 MBQB 87 Rempel J ordered a Winnipeg pharmacists to pay $150,000 in damages to his regulatory body which he accused of covering up the deaths of 24 indigenous people. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
And it will be decades before most people even realize how much damage was done here. [read post]
