Search for: "People v. Fair" Results 3501 - 3520 of 10,543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
The other notable case last week was Arizona Free Enterprise PAC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
  Money, or having to give it to someone else drives people insane. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"Plaintiff's second charge that the settlement was coerced or fair has no merit. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
Two years after the Koons case, the Supreme Court recast fair use in Campbell v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Despite a lack of evidence that abortion regret was a widespread phenomenon, Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:31 am by SHG
In a bizarre comparison, Nico Pitney at Huff Post compares Donald Trump with Louis Stokes, who argued for the petitioner in Terry v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:23 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Williams civil committed as a detained sex offender requiring confinement pursuant to the Sex Offender Management and Treatment Act (SOMTA)(see).Today, the Court of Appeals, in People v Harnett (2011 NY Slip Op 00744 [2/11/11/]) rejected the argument that since a possible consequence of a plea to a sex conviction is a lifetime civil commitment, fundamental fairness requires that the failure to warn a defendant who pleads guilty to a sex offense that he may be subject to… [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 7:25 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:20 am by Peter Kaufman
[UPDATE: January 18, 2010:] As reported on Io Group v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 2:07 pm by Mark Zamora
A judge  has ordered a 10.5 million dollar  Accutane verdict overturned "because the original verdict followed from an unfair trial.During the trial Roche, the maker of Accutane, was not allowed to present evidence regarding how many people used Accutane until the final stages of the trial.The New Jersey Appellate Court ruled that Roche did not have "a full and fair opportunity... to present and advocate the relevant numbers evidence," Bloombery… [read post]