Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 3501 - 3520
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2011, 3:05 am
Waxman, a former United States solicitor general, was caught in the cross-fire. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:06 am
United States is 4-1-4, with Justice Ginsburg writing the plurality opinion and Justice Alito concurring in the judgment in a separate opinion. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 11:56 am
United States, 217 U. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:54 pm
The case, Doyle Randall Paroline v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:54 pm
The case, Doyle Randall Paroline v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:54 pm
The case, Doyle Randall Paroline v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
Wade will be repealed (with abortion still possibly legal on a state-by-state basis) but whether the Court would invent a doctrine under which abortion would be constitutionally prohibited nationwide.Beyond abortion, I asked whether even Griswold v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:18 am
The case was then appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:31 am
Not every day does the United States Supreme Court weigh in on a topic impacting the trademark world, but it did so yesterday in Already, LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
The case is now pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 10:43 am
More recently, under Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court in the name of freedom of speech has expanded the ability of corporations and unions to spend funds directly in elections in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 9:39 am
The United States, which until now had never brought a challenge to a state abortion restriction, argued that S.B. 8 interferes with its sovereign interest in ensuring that states recognize federal constitutional rights. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:00 pm
Whenever the United States Supreme Court issues an opinion stating or creating expanded rights to criminal defendants, those already convicted who might benefit from the opinion, wonder whether the rule will have retroactive or retrospective effect, or only prospective effect. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 5:37 am
United States, U.S., No. 04-1034 (2006). [read post]
Following Judge Sutton’s rejection of the “inactivity” argument, the Supreme Court can take its time
5 Aug 2011, 1:00 pm
Lopez (1995) and United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
United States, which upheld the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II, “as ‘good law,’ or ‘technically still on the books,’’’ stating: “No decent person can view the internment as any kind of ‘precedent’ for acceptable government behavior. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
United States in Kermit L. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 12:41 pm
Stanford student JP Schnapper-Casteras discusses oral argument in Boyle v. [read post]
