Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 3501 - 3520
of 9,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2018, 4:45 pm
United States, 328 U.S. 750, 758 (1946). [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm
The court’s decision in Kleindienst v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:12 pm
They have tended to focus on two main aspects of this interface: innovative legal-tech and interdisciplinary collaboration between law schools and STEM-oriented units. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:03 pm
Could the president ban all Syrians from coming to the United States, Roberts asked?... [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:26 pm
That can’t be the law of the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:58 am
How can it be that individual decisions of a low-level consular officer are not reviewable, but an executive order issued by the President of the United States is? [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 5:00 am
As Robert Williams points out in Lawfare, the broad tariffs were designed to indirectly target Chinese steel coming into the U.S. from third countries; however, the measures are universal and will primarily hurt close U.S. allies. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am
In Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:39 am
But here, the efficiency impact of the procedural question at issue was of limited importance, and absolutely not outcome-determinative (as the result shows).In Oil States, the Supreme Court had only two dissenters (Justice Gorsuch, joined by Chief Justice Roberts). [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:37 am
He told Phillips that he wasn’t convinced that the court’s 1942 decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
This morning brought decisions in both of the patent cases argued in November, with the government prevailing on the constitutional question raised in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm
The panel, moderated by Celeste Higgins, includes: Honorable United States Magistrate Lauren Fleischer Louis, J.J. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:43 am
In response to newly disclosed documents undergirding the international intelligence sharing arrangement between the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, Scarlet Kim, Diana Lee, Asaf Lubin, and Paulina Perlin summarized several of the disclosures and their implications. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:41 am
Responding to the government’s argument that the Supreme Court has on previous occasions recognized that a sentencing reduction based upon Section 3582(c)(2) is not governed by the constitutional or remedial holding of United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am
Iqbal (and the 2007 case of Bell Atlantic v Twombly) held is insufficient to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
Specifically at issue in the case of Trump v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:15 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, about whether that agency’s administrative law judges are “officers” of the United States under the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm
” As Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized repeatedly during the argument, the clause reflects the concern of the Constitution’s drafters with “accountability” – the idea that some readily identifiable official could be held accountable for the selection of any “officer” of the United States. [read post]
