Search for: "Redding v. Redding" Results 3501 - 3520 of 7,772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 5:04 am by Susan Brenner
  Kouruklis later testified that he found Martin’s actions to be a `red flag’ because: (1) nobody in the office needed that data at the time; (2) nobody else knew how to access that data; and (3) at the time, [Martin] was not working in either the refund or IT departments, or for Kouruklis. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Businessman Denis O’Brien has lost his appeal over the High Court’s refusal to make orders directing Red Flag Consulting to give him documents that might disclose the identity of its client for a dossier about the businessman. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 11:35 am by Minick Law
Red Herrings Argued by the State   Red Herring 1: What about Inadvertence of Statutory Violation? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:32 pm by James McNairy
On June 21, 2011, District Court Judge Sharon Coleman denied Vienna Beef LTD’s motion for a temporary restraining order which sought to enjoin competitor hot dog maker Red Hot Chicago , Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:22 pm by Joseph Eckhardt
  If Red Bull, Coca Cola, or coffee are reasonable substitute “energy drinks,” 8-Hour Energy’s monopolization case doesn’t have a chance. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm by WIMS
To date they have nothing to show for their investment except political delays, bureaucratic red tape, and a hole in the Nevada desert. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:10 pm
  The IPKat in his favourite holiday retreatKicking right in the week, court report from the UK: Sky v SkyKick - no CJEU reference re removal of own name defence to EUTMs ruled Birss J. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
I Injunction available after claimed licence fees paid - PPL v JJPB I Trademark application for the devil's horn withdrawn I Jo Johnson to continue as IP Minister I UPC Order on Privileges & Immunities placed before Parliament today I Celebrate 120 years of AIPPI in Sydney I Event invitation - The Pirate Bay communicates to the public: are there any more online infringement questions to be answered? [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:14 am
The post discusses the reasons for the unanimous conclusions reached in the  Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48 case.As the news about Google’s paid research was on all the headlines all around the World, Kat Nicola gave her own critical insight on the news on: The Smoking Gun - Is IP research the next tobacco scandal? [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
| Sheeran v Chokri Part 2: Admission of similar fact evidence | New Year, Same Creative Authorship Requirement in US Copyright | Reader discount for IPKat book award titles! [read post]