Search for: "STATE v BUSH" Results 3501 - 3520 of 4,538
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2008, 11:20 am
This week's oral arguments before the Supreme Court: This Thursday, Dec. 18th: 1:30 PM - Maggie Bush v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 2:13 pm
  The case, from the 9th Circuit, is United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:49 am
  Then there was State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:25 am
Knowsley Housing Trust v White (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening); Porter v Shepherds Bush Housing Association (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening); Islington London Borough Council v Honeygan-Green: [2008] UKHL 70 “On a proper construction of Part I of the Housing Act 1988 an assured tenancy subject to a [...] [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:20 am
The Court noted that its decision in Bush v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:58 am
High Court to Rule Again on Bush Detention Policies Legal Times The Supreme Court announced Friday it has granted review in al-Marri v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 9:51 pm
Bush appointed a longtime family friend and former business partner, Fred V. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:20 pm
" The proposition that too many warnings can have detrimental health effects by deterring the use of beneficial drugs isn't something made up by the Bush administration. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 7:20 pm
Jess Bravin, the WSJ’s Supreme Court reporter, sent along the following writeup after sitting in on today’s hearings in Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
So it was perfectly acceptable--i.e., unlike the case with Bush v. [read post]