Search for: "STATE v. JACKSON" Results 3501 - 3520 of 6,527
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm by Stephen Griffin
  But unlike contemporary versions of originalism, these theories hold that constitutional change, even amounting to “amendment,” has occurred (on both empirical and normative grounds) and are legitimate outside Article V. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:10 am
 Zahorik v State, 2015 WL 5042105 (Fourteenth Court of Appeals of Texas 2015). [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
Already pending at the Court is an appeal by Mississippi state officials (Currier v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:30 am by Robert Kreisman
United States Illinois Appellate Court Resolves Breach of Lease Agreement Because of Damage to Property       [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:55 am
McKee Door Sales, 2013-Ohio-4217).This blog is presented by Steve Richman, Esq. and Connie Carr, Esq. of Kohrman Jackson & Krantz P.L.L. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 3:46 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Burwell (Affordable Care Act - Large Employer Mandate Exemption)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlTrent v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
  They made the following pertinent observations: applying Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 193, under the Convention a state need only pursue a legitimate aim in a proportionate way: Strasbourg does not demand that it do any more; the court must give considerable weight to informed legislative choices, at least where the state is seeking to reconcile the competing interests of different groups in society; and a legislative or regulatory… [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:38 pm by Patricia Salkin
Premier Pawn, Inc. v City of Jackson, 2015 WL 4478557 (SS MS 7/22/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/mississippi/mssdce/3:2014cv00518/86470/17/Filed under: Current Caselaw, Enforcement Tagged: building permit mistake, pawn shops [read post]
Court of Appeal Before Jackson, Lloyd Jones and Floyd LJJ, [2013] EWCA Civ 616 (see here), the Home Secretary argued that the decision made Pham de facto stateless (with nationality but denied the protection which should go with it), but not de jure stateless (without nationality under the laws of any state) and therefore it did not make him stateless within the meaning of section 40(4) of the 1981 Act. [read post]