Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 3501 - 3520 of 21,151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Although the United States suffered a long era in which the law made it difficult, if not impossible, to access contraception—a federal law passed in 1873 restricted the sale and circulation of contraception among other “obscene” things—that era more or less ended in 1965 when the Supreme Court ruled in Griswold v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:34 pm by Doug Van Gessel and Sean Maffett
The Real Property Transfer Tax Ordinance does not define “realty sold,” but states that the scope of “realty” is determined by the definition or scope of the term under state law. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:13 pm by Jeanne Huang
Along with the rise of legal positivism, international law became perceived as the body of law dealing with external aspects of States or, in other words, with relationships between States. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Sales tax rates, hiked in the preceding years, came down—but the Nutmeg State’s property taxes remain among the highest in the country. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Sophia Gaulkin
Supreme Court’s 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:40 pm by Shira M. Blank and Joshua A. Stein
This risk is only heightened — particularly for those operating in California — following a slew of recent decisions, including one from the California Court of Appeals just last month in Martinez v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Wayfair when a majority overruled precedent that had shielded businesses that lacked physical presence in a state from state sales tax. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 4:51 am by Peter Mahler
Realty Associates LLC v Blumberg, 2020 NY Slip Op 32200(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 7, 2020]  The aptly named S.O.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 5:40 pm by Francis Pileggi
The appeal The high court reversed, finding that, as required under the milestone Cinerama decision (Cinerama, Inc. v. [read post]