Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 3501 - 3520 of 5,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2011, 9:22 am
The application for the search warrant does not support a warrant for the search and seizure of any and all electronic storage devices found at Schesso’s residence in order to comb through these devices to determine what other crimes may have been committed. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm by nflatow
Jones’ car with a GPS device after the warrant expired. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am by Kiran Bhat
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr contends that because both the installation of the GPS device and the subsequent use of that device could be considered a search, “[t]he tricky question is, what happens if a majority of the Court concludes that somewhere in the process of installing and using the GPS there is a search or seizure, but there is no agreement as to which steps triggers the analysis or what constituties [sic] reasonableness? [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:23 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
That said, it appears the search v. seizure issue need not be resolved, necessarily, to secure a court majority in this case. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
Barnett argued the trial court erred in concluding police seizure of items pursuant to a search warrant did not constitute a theft within the policy terms. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
Barnett argued the trial court erred in concluding police seizure of items pursuant to a search warrant did not constitute a theft within the policy terms. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
I testified in that case two weeks ago as an expert on legal ethics and the law of search and seizure that everybody screwed this up: the trial judge, the defense lawyer, and the District Attorney. [read post]
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in an important case that confronts how to apply Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures to new technologies. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:32 pm
MARCIA COYLE: Well, Judy, as you know, the Fourth Amendment protects us from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:07 pm by admin
The Fourth Amendment prohibits authorities from conducting “unreasonable searches and seizures,” such as entering someone’s home, unless they can obtain a warrant by persuading a magistrate of “probable cause” to suspect a crime. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm by Greg Nojeim
Jones’ lawyer focused on whether installation of the GPS device on Jones’ Jeep was a “search” or a “seizure,” betting that the court might want to decide the case on that narrow question. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:02 pm
The amendment rules that individuals shall not be subjected to “unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:06 am
The Fourth Amendment and Article I, §7 of the Washington State Constitution The Fourth Amendment provides that people should not be subject to unreasonable searches and seizures and that search warrants should only be issued after probable cause is established. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:21 am by Jess Bravin
Today the case of whether the government can put a GPS tracker on someone’s car without a warrant comes before the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:23 am
Here, while the information on which the search warrant was based derived from a source wholly independent of the initial unlawful seizure, the search itself cannot be said to have been conducted independent of the seizure, as it was the seizure that in fact made possible the search that actually occurred. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:19 am
Williams [2010], 615 F.3d [657] at 670, n. 6 (‘[Allowing information obtained from a suspect about an outstanding warrant to purge the taint of an unconstitutional search or seizure would have deleterious effects. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 1:03 pm by Susan Brenner
Day claimed the arrest violated the 4th Amendment’s prohibition on “unreasonable” seizures, an arrest constituting a seizure of a person. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:44 am by Russ Bensing
  Basically, if the warrant was discovered as a result of an unlawful stop or seizure (unless its discovery was unconnected to and attenuated from the illegality), then any evidence seized in the search incident to the arrest must be suppressed. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 9:17 pm
This act may be able to protect our electronic content from unreasonable searches and seizures in the Social Media Age. [read post]