Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 3,989
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2009, 7:24 pm
In Nahigian v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:24 pm
In Nahigian v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
., SEC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
But some states like New York will look at them under the same test - meaning counsel must tailor them narrowly to protect an employer's business interest. -- Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Opinion Date: 10/1/09 Cite: Cenveo Corp. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
Relying on Inwood Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:16 am
Miller v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
§2902, is fairly apportioned under the Commerce Clause, when the State taxes Ford Motor Company based on the fact that its goods were "physically delivered" into the State, and whether this gross receipts tax as a transaction tax on the seller that only one State has the right to tax, rather than as a tax on income that must be apportioned, violates the Commerce Clause by permitting the taxation of sales that occur outside the… [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 10:37 am
In Doss, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:26 am
Fresh Coat, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:15 am
County of Nassau v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:35 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of AlabamaOpinion Date: 9/1/09Cite: Movie Gallery US, LLC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:33 pm
USOC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
It stated all the dosages correctly as well as the consequences of overdose. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:08 am
” Blough v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 9:08 pm
” Blough v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
Legal rules, convenient fictions, and figuring out when you've agreed to something you haven't read.
14 Sep 2009, 7:26 am
In Specht v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
United States, 556 F.3d 1244, 1250 (11th Cir. 2009). [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 5:38 pm
Lapine v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
