Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 3501 - 3520 of 41,752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2013, 7:34 am by Kate Fort
May a tribal corporation none- theless act as a private attorney general by suing a non-Indian contractor in state court for disgorgement under California Business & Professions Code § 7031(b), for being unlicensed while constructing improvements on tribal trust land in connection with a tribal gaming enterprise? [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 1:07 pm
" This split is indicated on p. 41, and, on pp. 38-40, when the discussion of the majority opinion turns to the VI-B, the state constitutional claim, the "majority" language becomes that of a minority opinion. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:17 pm
§ 523(a)(1)(b) by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”). [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 6:30 am by Jon Muskin
Bed Bath & Beyond: Design Infringement Can ProceedBB&B initially moved to dismiss Hall’s complaint in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) – failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 6:16 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
USCIS, Sept. 4, 2024 - "This notice is to tell you about a proposed Settlement Agreement of a class action lawsuit, J.O.P. et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  In other words, as long as the shares were listed on a foreign exchange, Section 10(b) was inapplicable even if the trade occurred in the United States. [read post]