Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 3501 - 3520 of 4,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
WIAL's Notice of Arbitration mentions the court's advice of its inclination to dismiss the petition as the reason for its withdrawal.10.03.2003: Application by WIAL (GA 934/2003) before the Calcutta High Court to dismiss AP No. 290/2002.27.11.2003: GA 934/2003 was rejected by a Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court (judgement)15.12.2003: Appeal filed APOT 719/2003 from the decision of the Single Judge in GA 934/200307.05.2004: Appeal APOT… [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:34 am by Roy Black
With appeals and writs in the First District Court of Appeal (2 times), the Third District (3 times), the Fifth District, and the Florida Supreme Court (4 times). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am by Kenneth Vercammen
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Probate Part, Burlington County, Docket No. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
As the Court of Appeals has advised, "[i]t is a cardinal rule of construction that a court should not adopt an interpretation which will operate to leave a provision of a contract . . . without force and effect" (Corhill Corp. v S.D. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 3:58 am
   After my post yesterday on Lorain County Judge James  Burge’s decision to grant a judgment of acquittal under CrimR 29(C) to two defendants convicted of child rape 15 years earlier, I got a call from John Martin, noted appellate practitioner and head of the county’s Public Defender appellate division, who suggested I take a gander at State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 5:23 am by Jon May
What is critical is that Judge Cannon crossed way over the line when she refused to follow the decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:08 pm by grosin
In a recent opinion, the Third Division of the Fourth District of the California Court of Appeals reasoned that, by definition, a partnership requires at least two partners, and ruled that the withdrawal of one partner in a two-partner partnership automatically caused dissolution. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
I guess if I had to pick one thing it is the feeling that there is a really clear division between “science” and other kinds of expertise. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:13 am by emagraken
The BC Court of Appeal addressed this issue in reasons for judgement released this week (Steinebach v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:52 am by Susan Brenner
In New York, the Appellate Division held that, `[b]ank records . . . belong to the bank. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:48 pm by Amy Howe
And until the Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This was no more apparent than the Court’s decision in R. v. [read post]