Search for: "State v. Frame" Results 3501 - 3520 of 6,748
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2014, 7:25 am by Giles Peaker
The defendant intended and intends to attach a new ceiling to that metal frame. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 7:25 am by Giles Peaker
The defendant intended and intends to attach a new ceiling to that metal frame. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Indeed, while under Article 52(1)(a) CTMR the application date is the seminal moment for the examination invalidity grounds, examiners and Courts are free to consider any material subsequent to the date of application insofar as it enables conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date [see the CJEU’s orders in Alcon v OHIM, in Case C-192/03P, and Torresan v OHIM, in Case C-5/10]. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:42 am
That was the issue before Arnold J. in his latest judgment considering the SPC Regulation in (1) Sandoz Limited (2) Hexal AG v (1) G.D. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:38 am by Susan C. Morse
Both sides center their arguments on a test set forth in the 2015 case United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am by GuestPost
Attacks upon the State itself when they succeed cease to be within the scope of the criminal law. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm by NL
In Forcelux the discretion had been framed as wide and unfettered, but on the facts of that case the Court had had to go no further. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm by NL
In Forcelux the discretion had been framed as wide and unfettered, but on the facts of that case the Court had had to go no further. [read post]