Search for: "State v. House" Results 3501 - 3520 of 28,802
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
A family house likely will grow in value, and that value can be captured as a property tax by states. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 1:39 pm by Unknown
United States (Tribal Police; Tribal Law and Order Act) Hawk v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Katherine Pompilio
In response to the violence, the government declared a state of emergency, which will last for 30 days. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:23 am by Sam Callahan and Allon Kedem
ShareThe Supreme Court heard argument on Monday in LeDure v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
To take one random example, see Johnson v Unisys [2013] 1 AC 518, in which the House of Lords held that it was not permissible to bring a common law claim for breach of contract which would sidestep the restrictions on the statutory unfair dismissal regime. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
In this case, a majority of the House of Lords ruled that a very open-ended grant of emergency powers by Parliament authorised the executive to deprive individuals of liberty without due process on grounds of the national interest, or, though the judges did not use this expression, on grounds of “reason of state”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
In the possession claim, Croydon had served a reply to defence stating that it did not rely upon forfeiture as a ground of possession. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 3:00 am by Christopher Tyner
Supreme Court, yesterday the Court decided in Ramirez v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Francis KeanNoona BarlowOn this site, I try to keep my readers up to date on the latest developments in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]