Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
The task for the drafter of the code is to make sense of all of this, taking account of the law as it had developed in and after the House of Lords decision in Ahmad v Newham LBC (links to our note), as well as the policy desire since the days of Caroline Flint as housing minister to "reward" those in or seeking employment through allocations priorities. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:12 am
Will’s editorial in the Washington Post argues that SCOTUS should grant cert in the Fisher v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:47 am
Secondly, the Court stated [66] that while the prosecution and defence arguments may be of assistance to the judge, there are interests – presumably the interest in open justice – that they cannot always adequately represent: ‘… there are some cases, of which the present… may be an example, where the judge would be greatly assisted by an independent lawyer assigned to provide assistance in the same way as in the present case both the [trial] judge and this… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 9:02 am
A priority claim was thereby added, the prior art was then no longer within the state of the art, and the opponent’s case was effectively over. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:53 am
Article L.851-3 starts by stating that the processing should not allow the identification of individuals. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
In the recording, Alito laments the divisions in the country, stating, “I wish I knew. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
The task for the drafter of the code is to make sense of all of this, taking account of the law as it had developed in and after the House of Lords decision in Ahmad v Newham LBC (links to our note), as well as the policy desire since the days of Caroline Flint as housing minister to "reward" those in or seeking employment through allocations priorities. [read post]
1 May 2025, 9:05 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
We note that Lord Phillips in Spiller v Joseph also doubted the need for this requirement…Any article 8 concerns are properly the subject of the law governing privacy, not defamation. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:22 am
In Inmacs Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:00 pm
Quite soon the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) will give its judgment on a preliminary reference from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) in Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
One case from 1909 where House of Lords first recognized “goodwill”—involved Spaulding, an American company making sports goods. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
Bell because of a new state law that sharply restricts how they can be paid. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am
And where it is the state gathering and using this material there is a pretty good chance that it isn't lawful at all (parents need not panic this applies to situations where social workers are looking at and gathering data about private individuals). [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm
Despite the controversy around these practices, it has never been discussed at the Supreme Court of Canada, until their recent decision in R. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:59 am
Para tentar entender esse vocábulo é necessário descrever os vários tipos de família existentes, e suas características específicas. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 2:24 pm
Lord and undeposable ruler, perfection in the house of wisdom, Lord infinite in knowledge, we who fail to know you fully will fail, if we could but know you fully, all would be well with us.] [read post]
