Search for: "State v. Mai" Results 3501 - 3520 of 133,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Federal RFRA May Not Be Used to Disable State Law Long before Hobby Lobby was decided, in 1997, the Supreme Court held that RFRA was unconstitutional in Boerne v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:04 am
In part: While the state courts' factual finding that defense counsel's decision not to investigate evidence of his mental deficiencies was tactical may qualify as "unreasonable" under §... [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:37 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
While the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court may doubt the existence of the CSI Effect, it recently ruled in Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:36 am
" It also states that "Lessors and Lessee agree that the holding in the case of Heritage Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Sarah Friedman
On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 5:47 pm
Had the state just banned condoms or the pill, it's hard to imagine a different outcome.Maybe a harder case would be presented if the state offered a health justification for the ban. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 5:19 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Nothing in Wal-Mart appears to me particularly relevant to state-court litigation, but certain Justices may have a different view. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am by Rebecca Griffiths, Olswang
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]