Search for: "State v. Master"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 3,868
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2009, 1:27 pm
Shah whether he agreed that under United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:01 pm
For background, see Jonathan Pink interviews: District Court Invalidates Portion of Copyright Act as Unconstitutional; Holds State University and Employee Immune From Claim for Copyright Infringement (April 15, 2008) and Follow up questions on state university copyright immunity case - Marketing Information Masters v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
" Haven't they heard of United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:20 pm
S.A. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 6:55 am
(C.M.) v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 9:09 am
Massad, William V. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:19 am
Thus, the Court overruled Kansas's exception to the Special Master's report and held that the "best approach" is a uniform rule across original and appellate actions on expert witness attendance fees, as governed by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:27 am
(The case is Kansas v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:54 pm
KSR v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:50 am
Katz v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:30 am
The third states it is a decision of the Court of Appeal in February 2007. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 5:59 am
· Before these laws were enacted, a well-established common-law principle held that a master or employer was responsible for the injury or death of employees resulting from a negligent act by the master or employer. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:57 am
In Xiong v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 9:11 pm
No. 1750, a decision of Master Nitikman where, at para. 13, the master stated: A third applicable principle is that the party seeking the examination is not limited to one independent examination but The court will not order a second examination merely to permit the defendant to get a second opinion on the same matter. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:34 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Critchley v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 12:44 pm
In a brief memorandum opinion, the New York Court of Appeals (the state's highest court) today affirmed the Appellate Division's decision in Aspen Creek Estates, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 2:40 am
Althen v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 2:14 pm
" The landmark 1953 case that gave vitality to the "state secrets" privilege was United States v. [read post]
