Search for: "State v. Masters"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 3,927
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2009, 5:24 am
But, is that so, after Solis v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
People v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:50 pm
The test for a second opinion was recently re-stated by Master Hyslop in Shaw v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:43 am
VCG Special Opportunities Master Fund LimitedU.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:17 pm
Relying largely on United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 3:01 am
(photo credit)The second legal development is the trial and proceedings in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
Considering criminal conviction in determining qualification of an applicant for employment in the public serviceMatter of El v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2009 NY Slip Op 50883(U), Decided on April 1, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Judge Alice Schlesinger [This opinion will not be published in the Official Reports.]Civil Service Law Section 50.4 provides for the disqualification of applicants or eligibles for appointment in the Classified Service and states that:… [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
Bank v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:50 pm
The ruling in H.M. v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:17 am
United States Coast Guard
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:56 pm
[Southern District of Florida Blog] Clear Marine Ventures, Ltd. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 12:58 am
But in a surprise move Tuesday, attorneys Theodore Olson and David Boies, who opposed each other in Bush v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 9:22 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:25 am
Thereafter, Utopia moved in the New York State Supreme Court, Kings County, for a stay of the arbitration. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:31 am
Pennsylvania State Ass'n of County Comm'rs v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
18 May 2009, 3:36 am
The Supreme Court granted cert. today in a case, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 1:06 pm
Additionally, the ISPS Code recognizes that "[a]t all times the Master of a ship has the ultimate responsibility for the safety and security of the ship. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:40 am
This is two levels below Master which is the basic professional caliber. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:53 am
As the US Supreme Court said in Tehan v United States, 383 US 406, 416 (1996), "[t]he basic purpose of a trial is the determination of truth. [read post]
