Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 3501 - 3520 of 20,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2014, 10:53 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
The missing documents -- some of which have never resurfaced -- included a 1952 letter from future Chief Justice William Rehnquist, then a law clerk for Justice Robert Jackson, allegedly expressing disappointment with the Court's decision to overturn Plessy v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:44 am by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy, announcing his opinion and the Court’s ruling in Salazar, et al., v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 7:40 am
The Lewis & Clark Law Review has posted online the various contributions to their symposium, "Speech and the Public Schools After Morse v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes:  Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices DeWine, Fischer, O’Neill, and French. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 2:02 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Court’s Opinion The Court’s ruling comes in two cases: Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 2:02 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Court’s Opinion The Court’s ruling comes in two cases: Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 12:26 pm
Wright still holds the record, I believe: the court overruled 16 of its own cases and disapproved 6 Court of Appeals opinions. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:31 am by MBettman
Justice DeWine, Majority Opinion On March 13, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Vossman v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
** Will the Supreme Court keep intact its declaration in a 2008 lethal-injection case (Baze v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:29 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
This post is part of an ACSblog online symposium on oral argument in HHS v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 3:39 am
 Despite the decision that a party need not have permission from the Court to adduce evidence such as Dr Erlich's report, the Court still retains control of evidence to be adduced by way of its discretionary  powers to exclude evidence under CPR 32.1 and having regard to the overriding objective. [read post]