Search for: "Strange v. Strange" Results 3501 - 3520 of 3,726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2018, 11:34 am by David Post
It's a pretty complicated and strange-looking little legal animal that Mr. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am by Rachel E. VanLandingham
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:35 am by timothy-abeel
Misfires cause strange noises, excess vibration, and a decrease in performance. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:18 am by INFORRM
Strangely, the Response displays no recognition that the victims of press malpractice also experience the [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm by Daniel B. Cohen
When the basic standard itself is problematic, all the rest of the regulatory requirements around that standard look very strange. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 12:01 am by Joanna L. Grossman
Courts began to recognize in the late 1970s that sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination, a proposition the Supreme Court agreed with in its 1986 ruling in Meritor v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:51 am by Brandon Kain
Certain torts require proof of intentional misconduct (inducing breach of contract) or malice (malicious prosecution), while others require only a lack of reasonable care (negligence) or give rise to strict liability (the Rylands v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Not one of three lawyers who argued in Samantar v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:16 am by Ezequiel Heffes
Accordingly, it is expected that respect for IHL (or lack thereof) can be determined by the following factors: (i) knowledge and internalization of the law: a higher degree of respect is achieved when States and NSAGs know their obligations, adopt internal rules to behave accordingly and apply sanctions in the event of violations; (ii) an alignment of IHL with traditional norms and religious values: identifying commonalities between these normative frameworks and disseminating these among weapons… [read post]
Quite soon the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) will give its judgment on a preliminary reference from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) in Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am by Steve Vladeck
Usually, the case-or-controversy requirement shows up in appellate review by requiring that the appellant have Article III standing to appeal–the very defect that proved fatal to the Prop. 8 proponents in the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:04 am by Rory Little
” In a statement of “basics” that is a joy to us criminal law teachers – because the Court has not really addressed the topic since Standefer v. [read post]