Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2006, 3:50 am
In last year’s case of Netbored Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
A corporation is domiciled only in the state where it is incorporated (Sease v Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., of New York, 306 NY 284 [1954]). [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:23 am
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 11:38 am
In Esparza v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:38 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:09 am
This question arises from judicial campaign contributions and the escalating expenses of state judicial campaigns and the Supreme Court answered it Monday in Caperton v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 9:55 am
El Chapo Claims of Juror Misconduct Rejected by Appellate Court InUnited States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:42 am
In Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 10:02 am
In Kisela v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:11 pm
In the recent case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:20 am
One can certainly argue that there are similarly strong reasons for recognizing a privilege for journalist-source communications; indeed, most states have recognized such a privilege by statute. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:08 pm
Div., A-6036-07T2, February 19, 2010: “This state has a strong public policy favoring enforcement of [marital] agreements. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s the judgment of the FCA: York University v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm
The states mount a very strong defense of their state laws that allow private individuals to recover for injuries like this, as well as informing the court that the states have moved on their own to deal with this problem. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 5:13 pm
After all, he penned the majority opinion in Rice v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:30 pm
In Camuti v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
The decision in Alexander is a strong reminder that even in state court class actions, expert proof at the class certification stage is important because it can frame how the issues must be tried at trial. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am
Just when we thought Member States had succeeded in removing many of the most concerning crimes from the convention’s text, they could be making a reappearance. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
