Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2009, 8:15 am
Richardson and Califano v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 12:44 pm
Here the Court was unanimous in the judgment, vacating a lower court decision that deferred to the FCC's interpretation of language in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), but split on whether deference was actually due. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 7:46 am
It isn’t a law that would be made up out of whole cloth. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/CzIbAi1Wyw -> Telus sues federal government over wireless policy http://t.co/dZifuhsGsw -> HBC looks to Saks deal to transform luxury e-commerce in Canada http://t.co/v9hMyRXIGM -> Long story short: Fair use is theft by any other name http://t.co/Hm23G1GrWs -> Copyright Takedowns on Twitter Are Up 76 Percent http://t.co/SrXWkSiokh -> nectivity, Content and Consumers: Britain’s digital platform for growth http://t.co/sIkjJLDFri -> Towards a… [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:27 am
Coach isn’t the only one seeing red . . . [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:38 am
(I don’t understand why the opinion refers to “computer fraud” rather than transmitting code and damaging a protected computer in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am
However, occasionally judges simply reject Section 230 because they don’t like it (this year’s crop include Jones v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
The revision featured no explicit lyrics and covered up all of those skimpy bikinis on the cover art. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, (2020), it can only be exercised by the President and those acting under him, see id. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:03 am
[quotation from §314.70(c) omitted] Section 314.70(c) creates a specific procedure allowing drug manufacturers to change labels that are insufficient to protect consumers, despite their approval by the FDA. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
District http://t.co/pRretycdAF -> Antonick v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
But, again, you can’t make people watch, listen, or read if they don’t want to. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 4:30 am
Source Media Group Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:32 am
I won't get into that debate here. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:48 am
& creating hedge fund to limit Madoff exposure suffic. pled wilful blindness to fraud. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsKatz-Wilpon-SDNY-Rakoff-9-27-11.pdf … SDNY: Lack of due diligence in suspicious circs (compared with "red flags") isnt lack of good faith in SIPA §548 cases. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsKatz-Wilpon-SDNY-Rakoff-9-27-11.pdf … SDNY: Madoff ponzi recipients can rebut §548… [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
Natasha Tusikov (Assistant Professor, Criminology Program, Department of Social Science, York University) presented on You don’t own your tractor: redefining ownership in the Internet of things. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:39 pm
Consumer, designer? [read post]
