Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 11,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2013, 8:58 am
Finally, the Court found that an order barring Mr. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:03 pm
Regents of the University of California While this is not strictly an employment law case, it will have a big impact on employment. [read post]
9 May 2013, 8:06 am
We suspect (although precise data is not available) that state court filings, especially in key states like California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts, have at least similar increases in state court wage and hour lawsuits. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:58 am
And the Supreme Court held then that states should not be forced to "straight jacket" themselves (in the Court's words) to the common law procedure of old England that was found in the Bill of Rights, but should be free to experiment to create more efficient criminal and civil procedure. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:30 am
And the Supreme Court held then that states should not be forced to "straight jacket" themselves (in the Court's words) to the common law procedure of old England that was found in the Bill of Rights, but should be free to experiment to create more efficient criminal and civil procedure. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:58 am
And the Supreme Court held then that states should not be forced to "straight jacket" themselves (in the Court's words) to the common law procedure of old England that was found in the Bill of Rights, but should be free to experiment to create more efficient criminal and civil procedure. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
In a recent California decision, the state’s court of appeal found that such financial professionals have more skill and bargaining power than the average worker and are, therefore, less vulnerable to exploitation. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:15 am
Alliantgroup is headquartered in Texas, with offices in 11 states, including California. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:03 pm
Or, do state and American Bar Association ethical rules preclude this prohibition? [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:24 pm
In response to the latest Arizona law, and other state's immigration laws, once complete border control is established state and local governments would be barred from enacting their own immigration laws. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
The lower court dismissed the case after giving plaintiffs an opportunity to amend, finding that the amended complaint still did not state facts sufficient to find the existence of a "security." [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
This decision does not change the requirement for California brokers representing either party to perform their fiduciary duties to their clients regarding inspection and disclosure- a reasonably diligent inspection is the norm established by court decisions and industry practice. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 6:14 pm
When questioned whether overruling Broughton and Cruz would be applicable only in federal courts or in California state courts as well, the voluble Chamber of Commerce amicus counsel opted for the more aggressive interpretation, whereby the disposition would be applicable in state and federal courts alike. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Thus, the second question asked the Court whether a state was barred, by preemption principles, from reducing the level of Medicaid reimbursement “based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the statute.” It seemed clear that, in each of the petitions, California officials were most concerned about being required to abide by court-imposed costing requirements, believing that such commands intruded upon the discretion that… [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 11:08 am
State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 7:09 am
The Court declined to reconsider a 27-year-old ruling that a state government has no legal immunity to lawsuits against it in the courts of another state. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 1:30 pm
Courts of Appeals Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2015cta.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:04 am
Court records state that a woman, her fiance and son were in the parking lot of an apartment complex when a man got out of a car parked next to them and fired a gun at them before fleeing the scene. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:48 pm
We note that the referral was allegedly improper because a referral service used by Henderson was not a “referral service or agency operated by a state or local bar association,” as required by the [California Structured Settlement Protection Act] . . . . [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
Background The New York law at the center of the case resembles gun-control measures in several other states, including California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. [read post]
