Search for: "Thomas v. State" Results 3501 - 3520 of 15,460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2007, 7:07 am
Thomas (06-130), on the authority of federal courts to examine the subjective thoughts of defense counsel challenged as ineffective in a criminal case. ** Mineral County v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:07 am by Administrator
Within those regulations, they state that these regulations are intended to reflect Central Laborers’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:13 am by Paul Horwitz
Smith) rather than a balancing of factors (ie., Sherbert v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:26 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The Supreme Court of North Dakota rendered an opinion in State v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:11 am
Correction officers may be sued by prisoners seeking money damages for alleged violations of 42 USC §1983 rights in state supreme courtHaywood v Drown et al, Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York, USSC No. 07-10374.Decided May 26, 2009New York's Correction Law §24 provides that New York State's trial courts of general jurisdiction cannot entertain §1983 suits filed by prison inmates seeking money damages from… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 2:04 pm
Mediation had been held on November 20, 2007 without resolution before Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, who is best known for presiding over United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 4:02 pm
  Finally, the Court held that the shackling of Ayala during her non-jury sentencing was not an abuse of discretion.United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:05 am
Thomas Fisher, Kathleen Halloran, and George BehrensCase number: 07-cv-04483 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois)Case filed:August 9, 2007Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 29, 2013 6/19/2013 9/17/2013 More notices are listed in my previous post. [read post]
20 May 2013, 3:18 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
Royal Dutch Petroleum, and the International Court of Justice in Germany v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:02 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) In non-mandate news, the Supreme Court issued two merits opinions today, including Zivotofsky v. [read post]