Search for: "UNITED STATES NAVY"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 3,676
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2007, 2:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:59 pm
App. 2003), and the Navy-Marine Corps Court's holding in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 1:00 pm
While Judge Erdmann didn't tip his hand, Chief Judge Effron emphasized that accepting Army GAD's and the Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Government Division's arguments that CAAF had no jurisdiction would require overruling United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 4:10 am
This includes any person who is a citizen, national or permanent resident alien of the United States employed in a workplace in a foreign country by an employer that is an entity incorporated or otherwise organized in the United States or that is controlled by an entity organized in the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 3:39 pm
Like Jami, I served aboard a United States submarine during Vietnam. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:11 am
United Cerebral Palsy has assembled a Resource Guide to help locate the needed assistance in the District of Columbia. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 5:56 am
Murphy, USN, to House Judiciary Committee witness SCPO Malcolm Nance, USN (Ret.), and to all the other honorable veterans of the United States Navy and Naval Reserve (including my dad). [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:41 pm
" [United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 4:24 pm
See Record at 154-66, 223-28, 233, 246-47, and 324-28; see also United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 4:01 pm
Accordingly, it is ordered that the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 9:25 am
The United States, with its Alaskan coast, is the only Arctic nation that is not party of the treaty. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 1:42 am
Navy and the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 11:55 am
" The Judge Advocates General of the United States Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines have agreed that the use of simulated drowning would violate U.S. law and the laws of war. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:35 pm
See United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:01 am
In the case, United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 3:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
" In the course of holding that it doesn't, the court noted: "See also United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 2:16 pm
In fact, that is precisely what they want us to see - how justice can be ultimately made elastic and modifiable, how it can be architected to fit any set of legalistic circumstances or interpretation thereof; how it can literally remake the political landscape in its own image...Next, from the New Yorker (via Willamette Week):Underwear DiplomacyClive Stafford Smith is fond of citing the ironies of the justice system... at Guantánamo Bay... but perhaps the most bizarre of… [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
