Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 3501 - 3520 of 9,841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2017, 7:14 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer operates 22 stores in the United States, including the New York location where the plaintiff worked. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am by Ron Coleman
Applicant maintained that the dominant portion of his design is the map of Africa, while in the cited mark the map of the United States is dominant, that the cited design suggests that Africa dominates the United States, and that the alteration of his design to fit the United States outline within the map of Africa profoundly changes the commercial impression of his mark as compared to the cited mark. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Remaking the DMCA in such a way would shift almost the entire burden and cost of enforcement from copyright holders to OSPs. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
For example, a case with a caption like United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 3:39 am
  Read comments and post your comment TTABlog comment: The cost-shifting of Rule 2.123(c) was also the subject of the recent precedential decision in United States Postal Service v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:28 pm by Michael H. Payne and Casey J. McKinnon
United States provides hope to contractors that incur higher than anticipated costs on a requirements contract or, alternatively, on construction contracts where line item prices are based on estimated quantities. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
Joyce, 603 F.3d 1142-43 (9th Cir. 2010) (finding the expenses incurred by attorney for lodging and meals during oral argument and post-argument mediation to be “necessary expenses incurred by or on behalf of petitioner); Dawson, 2014 WL 4748512, at * 8 (awarding petitioner expenses for, inter alia, the cost of a private investigator to locate the abducted children in the United States); Saldivar v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
Our response to Question 16 above addresses the burden for users. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:43 pm by Debra A. McCurdy
” CMS has withdrawn a December 12, 2014 proposed rule to revise selected conditions of participation (CoPs) for providers, conditions for coverage for suppliers, and requirements for long-term care (LTC) facilities to conform with the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 11:08 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Reproductive Health Services, which gave greater leeway to the states to restrict abortion, and Rust v. [read post]