Search for: "United States v. Good"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 21,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
The state contends that Longoni was relying only on Rast’s notes; Smith contended that he relied on Rast’s report as well as on her notes, and treated them essentially as a unit. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:14 am
" What struck me initially about United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:33 am
In Georgia - and indeed, throughout the United States, we have a concept called "spoliation. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:30 am
United States, and more. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:46 pm
The Appellant’s brief in support of its Motion for Rehearing or Certification to the Supreme Court in the decision of the United States Fifth District Court of Appeals, in Marion v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:15 am
In April 2011, the United States Supreme Court provided a potential escape hatch for employers. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:06 am
In his brief in the Supreme Court, Percoco stresses that the court of appeals’ decision upholding his conviction relied on that court’s 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 2:40 pm
Getting into the United States is relatively easy. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 7:54 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:05 pm
Food Machinery,which held that antitrust liability could attach if a patentee obtained or preserved a monopoly by using a patent procured though intentional fraud on the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 2:17 am
Silverman, 338 F.3d 886 (8th Cir. 2003) [INCADAT reference: HC/E/USf 530] (United States); Kilah v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 10:36 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:04 pm
In Colony Insurance Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am
The position of the EUIPO, when it comes to acquired distinctiveness through use in the UK for the purposes of an invalidation action against a registered EU trade mark (EUTM), is that the distinctiveness acquired through use in the UK is not relevant for EU trade mark applications filed after the end of the transition period (December 31st, 2020).However, the now said has not always been entirely clear, since case law (Decathlon v EUIPO (T‑349/19) EU:T:2020:488), states that… [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 2:22 pm
ABC v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:54 pm
Guevara-Solórzano v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:51 am
Ct. 1683, 1689 n.2 (2020); see also United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:43 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in Smith v. [read post]
