Search for: "United States v. Michigan"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 3,728
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm
[ii] Michigan v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
" [24] The state expressly states that such a user may not have not have protection within the laws of Michigan, unless there is a state or federal statute that expressly requires a manufacturer to warn. [25] Other states have also chosen to adopt the doctrine. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 6:31 pm
Mar. 20, 2008).Michigan Raises the Tax Incentive BarMichigan is now offering the most generous film tax incentives in the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:26 am
In both cases, the Sixth found that no prejudice occurred.The Sixth started last Monday, April 7th, with its opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
Maydak, Opposition No. 91153172 (April 4, 2008) [precedential].Dodge DartApplicant Maydak appealed the adverse ruling of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, arguing, inter alia, that the injunction was overly broad. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 11:47 pm
Integra (Scripps v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 7:51 pm
As in the United States, corporations in Saudi Arabia are treated as fictional persons with specific legal obligations. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:37 pm
Hunt Transp Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0175n.06 Howard v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:44 pm
Microsoft Corp. v. z4 Tech. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 4:59 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 6:55 pm
The states alleged violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act and the New York, Illinois and Michigan antitrust statutes. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:51 am
In Ross v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 2:40 pm
Patterson in courtroom 24 of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl St., New York, NY 10007. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 10:40 am
This is the United States of America. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
Examples of such states include California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Tennessee, among others. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Warner-Lambert, 467 F.3d 85 (2nd Cir 2006), finding no preemption of Michigan law. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:05 am
United Transportation Union, 07-872). [read post]
