Search for: "VI" Results 3501 - 3520 of 13,319
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Les avocats et les notaires employés de l’Agence du revenu du Québec ne sont pas visés par la loi 2017 puisqu’ils ne sont pas rémunérés et nommés en vertu de la Loi sur la fonction publique. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:01 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
 The updated REACH Annex VI also defines specific characterization parameters for the nanoforms of substances. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:34 pm
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+VI&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=8350000&SeqEnd=10200000 https://www.custodyxchange.com/examples/holidays/  Read More [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 8:15 am
Title VI does not, and cannot, authorize the government to require federal funding recipients to de-emphasize the “positive aspects of Islam” to the Department’s satisfaction. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 8:15 am
Title VI does not, and cannot, authorize the government to require federal funding recipients to de-emphasize the “positive aspects of Islam” to the Department’s satisfaction. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:54 pm by Jamie Markham
That’s a felony under G.S. 14-144, but it is not covered because it is in Subchapter VI, not IV or V. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Reviewing assorted key moments in the past century of attempts at Jewish legal biography, I posit that two different approaches have governed these biographical efforts vis-à-vis the concept of interest: a liberal cosmopolitan meta-narrative that frames international Jewish lawyering as a form of legalist anti-politics; and a liberal nationalist meta-narrative that hails Jewish politics as the proper starting point for a necessary legal reordering of the world. [read post]
An inability to qualify as a QF would (i) deprive a facility of the ability to exercise the PURPA-put, (ii) deprive a facility of certain exemptions from the Federal Power Act and the Public Utility Holding Company Act, and (iii) alleviate electric utilities of the obligations they have vis-a-viz QFs under PURPA. [read post]
An inability to qualify as a QF would (i) deprive a facility of the ability to exercise the PURPA-put, (ii) deprive a facility of certain exemptions from the Federal Power Act and the Public Utility Holding Company Act, and (iii) alleviate electric utilities of the obligations they have vis-a-viz QFs under PURPA. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:41 am by Nicholas Moline
The post Collaborative Law Firm Part VI: The Fax is Dead, Long Live the Fax appeared first on Legal Marketing & Technology Blog. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 5:41 pm by Richard Hunt
It then argues that Shaw’s preferential treatment vis a vis this non-disabled person does not matter because: The inquiry is whether the requested accommodation would provide a disabled person an opportunity to enjoy a dwelling that would otherwise—due to his disability—elude him. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Consequently, patients suffer as they get the ‘wrong’ care[vi], families and SDMs suffer because they are stressed out by being thrust into a decision-making encounter when they don’t know what to do or say. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:08 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  The objectives of the study were to: Collect existing definitions of generations of nanomaterials; Refine these definitions to allow the sorting of different nanomaterials into different generations unambiguously; Establish an inventory of second or higher generation nanomaterials on the market or close to the market; and Assess the suitability of the terms “substance,” “mixture,” and “article” and of the identification and characterization parameters… [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:12 pm by Brandon Harter
This post is part of our ongoing series translating the lawyer-gibberish of Pennsylvania lawsuits into something understandable. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 1:52 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The Ninth Circuit has identified six relevant factors: (i) strength and value of trademark rights asserted; (ii) plaintiff’s diligence in enforcing mark; (iii) harm to senior user if relief denied; (iv) good faith ignorance by junior user; (v) competition between senior and junior users; and (vi) extent of harm suffered by junior user because of senior user’s delay.The first two factors weighed in favor of Peloton. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:37 am by Jacquelyn Greene
The existing restrictions on the types of offenses that can be referred to teen court (including a bar on offenses involving driving while impaired, Class A1 misdemeanors, an assault in which a weapon was used, and controlled substance offenses other than simple possession of a Schedule VI drug or alcohol) remain in place. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
La division d'opposition avait conclu que le motif d'opposition visé à l'article 100a) en combinaison avec l'article 56 CBE ne s'opposait pas au maintien du brevet européen, eu égard aux documents: D1 - D3[...]VI. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 2:45 pm by Editor
Titles IV and VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbid discrimination by elementary or secondary education programs run or funded by the federal government. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 2:45 pm by Editor
Titles IV and VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbid discrimination by elementary or secondary education programs run or funded by the federal government. [read post]