Search for: "WEEKS v. WILLIAMS" Results 3501 - 3520 of 4,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:31 am
This approach was on display during the dense and complex arguments in Samantar v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
While Congress exercises considerable control over the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, since the landmark decision in Marbury v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al. (1999). [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:45 pm by Amy Howe
Shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:49 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:52 am
Splenda case, or, as it's officially known, Merisant Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
After months of deliberation, last week the Supreme Court declined the most recent chance to revisit New York Times v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:30 am by Rick Houghton
  Articles IV and V oblige the U.S government and Soviet Union to destroy the missiles’ “launchers[,] support structures and support equipment . . . associated with such missiles and launchers. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
Sugar trade tariffs are “a classic case of protectionism, pure and simple, and that has ripple effects through other sectors of the economy, and, for all I know, the Hostess decision is one of them,” says William Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington.... [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
President Trump’s tweet a few weeks ago—indicating that he “would first head to the U.S. [read post]