Search for: "Bear v. State" Results 3521 - 3540 of 14,844
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
The current issue includes: Who Bear the Burden of Enforcement? [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
  This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Some Boards indicate that there is such a prohibition but that legitimate interest arises from e.g. broad vs narrow or from a longer term in case of internal priority (and one could also consider new states acceding to the EPC or becoming a new validation state in the priority period). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:20 am by John Jascob
The justices are scheduled to hear oral argument in Liu’s case on March 3, 2020 (Liu v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Sources: State statutes; state revenue departments; Tax Foundation research. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Balema produces and markets vinegar-based products made from wines from the Baden region, including bearing the terms "Balsamico" and "Deutscher balsamico". [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Balema produces and markets vinegar-based products made from wines from the Baden region, including bearing the terms "Balsamico" and "Deutscher balsamico". [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Balema produces and markets vinegar-based products made from wines from the Baden region, including bearing the terms "Balsamico" and "Deutscher balsamico". [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Balema produces and markets vinegar-based products made from wines from the Baden region, including bearing the terms "Balsamico" and "Deutscher balsamico". [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 6:22 am by Robert Chesney
In particular, an operation that otherwise would qualify as an SMCO will no longer do so unless the military has determined that the operation in question poses one of five types of risk: (i) “a medium or high collateral effects estimate” (ii) “a medium or high intelligence gain or loss” (iii) “a medium or high probability of political retaliation, as determined by the political military assessment contained with the associated concept of operations” (iv) “a… [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Igor De Lazari
The Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF), for example, has already ruled as much in State of Parana v. [read post]