Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 34,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2022, 11:08 am
” The “should consider” grammar is the kind of regulatory aspiration found in European law. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 2:30 am
(Aldana v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:41 am
In Iskanian v. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 5:19 pm
In Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 2:04 pm
" Imburgia is from California, and California law denies enforcement to at least some arbitration clauses that prevent the use of class action procedures. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 2:56 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
Blue Shield of California Life & Health Ins. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:54 pm
Read more about existing California law on background checks here. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:05 pm
Court of Appeals in San Francisco in an action under California law asserting that Honda’s advertisements misrepresented the characteristics of a braking system.California Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law, and Consumers Legal Remedies Act could not be applied to the entire nationwide class, and all consumers who purchased or leased an Acura RL automobile could not be presumed to have relied on the advertisements, the court held.Variances in… [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 2:24 pm
” (Quelimane Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:38 pm
The government’s brief contends the California law runs afoul of two NLRA preemption doctrines. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 6:47 am
In Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:41 pm
In Yahoo, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:31 pm
This may require security officers to remain on the premises and on call during paid rest periods, and to carry and monitor a communication device… it is the intent of the Legislature to abrogate, for the security services industry only, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Augustus v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:15 am
As we’ve discussed, the California Court of Appeal in AMN Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
There is a sort of “folk law” idea of what gross negligence is, perhaps informed by the law of other, non-California states. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 1:58 pm
Pork producers (who are mostly outside of California) argue that this law imposes an intolerable burden on interstate pork commerce and should be invalidated. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 5:00 pm
Brinkley is no longer good law and cannot be cited in California courts. [read post]
