Search for: "Case v. People" Results 3521 - 3540 of 51,345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 9:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Consider this case: A Florida court sent Natoya Cunningham to prison for eight years on the say of just six people. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 1:49 pm
 The case is still ongoing.Three times the trial court previously entered judgment in favor of the defendant. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:45 am by Rick Hasen
LATFOR case dropped their challenge of the state law ending prison-based gerrymandering. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:04 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Certainly under the facts of this case, the MV--50 form is not a 'written instrument'. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 6:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But it's not 1973 anymore.The case is Chase Group Alliance LLC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:21 am by Mark Tushnet
Another complication: When the judge sits on such a case, he or she may have antecedently concluded that affirming Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm
(Donn Logan et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents) (Boren, J., assigned justice pro tempore)(3) S093235 People v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 6:20 am
SCOTUSBlog reports on the cert petition in Boehner v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm
So there, now you know in case you were wondering about this.Well, I hope this video and blog will help you gain insight into how your personal injury case may end up in mandatory arbitration with a one-person judge, and no jury of 12 people from the community. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 6:08 am by stu@crimapp.com
In People v King a two to one panel of the Court of Appeals narrowly defined what a locked enclosure was in a manufacturing of marijuana case. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 10:48 am
At Monday's oral argument in Nijhawan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
The contributions to this on-line symposium on S.B. 1070 and Arizona v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Ezra Rosser
The case has stood, against the intention of the holding, for the conventional wisdom that the regulation of terms in consumer contracts hurts the people it is supposed to help (Part I and II). [read post]