Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 4,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 8:48 pm
This confusion is perhaps understandable given MVHC’s letter of April 23, 2015 that stated it required particulars of the Trust to determine S.A. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
At the heart of the single biggest issue there's the total absence, from the statute as well as the government's rationale, of the second eBay v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 10:48 am
While social media can create echo chambers, it can also expose people to ideas they wouldn’t otherwise encounter. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 1:19 am
Paris Tribunal, 17th chamber, 21 November 2018: Mrs X v SARL DenimA female model, Mrs X, participated in a photo shoot for SARL Denim, a clothes designer and defendant in the case. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
By the time this Kat got down to reading the decision of the Sixth Chamber of the General Court of the European Union in Case T‑320/10 Fürstlich Castell’sches Domänenamt Albrecht Fürst Zu Castell-Castell v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks And Designs) (OHIM), Castel Frères Sas, dating back to 13 September last, it was no longer topical and he decided not to write it up. [read post]
26 May 2019, 12:29 pm
” Tooke, 197 S.W.3d at 331 (quoting Beers v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
Justice Samuel Alito is up next with Husted v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 4:57 pm
South AfricaQwelane v. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 6:36 am
Let's recap the action.Smith v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:00 am
District Court Judge James Boasberg in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:05 am
Thanks to Henderson Chambers for the summary of this case. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
The part heard appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google (hearing to resume on 2 March 2015). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 9:42 am
The First Section ECtHR cited as authority the Grand Chamber’s exhaustive judgment in Fedotova and Others v Russia [2023] ECHR 55 (from which the Polish judge on the Court, Judge Wojtyczek, dissented – as did the Russian judge, notwithstanding that by the time that decision was handed down, Russia was no longer a party to the Convention). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
But we are not actually bound to do so or (in theory, at least) to follow a decision of the Grand Chamber. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:09 am
And if even one chamber in 12 state legislatures refused to ratify an amendment, it would die. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:00 pm
Nor could there be any reliance placed on Article 1 of the Convention to ensure the safety of potential deportees; the Grand Chamber in Bankovic v Belgium (2007) 44 EHRR SE5 established that the scope of Article 1 is limited, except in very particular circumstances where there is extra-territorial military control, to the jurisdiction of national states. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Both parties referred to dozens of investor-state cases which supported their arguments. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 10:13 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2015) Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has written a report on the recent Supreme Court of India case, Reserve Bank of India v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:08 am
” There were laughs in the chamber. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:30 am
In June, tobacco companies, local distributors, and convenience stores jointly filed a lawsuit (Naifeh v. [read post]
