Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 4,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 10:50 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am
In the courts: Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (30 March 2011): Supreme Court: Teachers employed by Sec of State to work abroad at European Schools entitled to the protection against unfair dismissal – see the Education Law Blog. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm
New York marks the fifth state in a row in which marriage equality has been achieved legislatively rather than through state court intervention: soon after Varnum v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
Institutional failure is driving the entrance of state and local governments into an area normally dominated by the federal government. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:23 am
Instead, the lawsuit builds on a 2003 United States Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:14 am
In 1927 the United States Supreme Court decided Robins Dry Dock and Repair Co. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:21 am
(Patent Baristas) US: FDA’s Chief Counsel, Ralph Tyler, set to leave FDA (FDA Law Blog) US: Docs at BIO: Steve Burrill’s state of the biotechnology industry report 2011 (Patent Docs) US: Counterfeiting: White House IP Czar Victoria Espinel on working with corporations (BIOtechNOW) US: Banning gene patents will promote innovation? [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 11:22 am
") AC30368 - Kopylec v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 10:20 am
It is an error of law not to take into account the fact a party was the dominant driver (Bedwell v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:25 pm
[T]he recent decision by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Monsanto v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:58 pm
Because both AT&T v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:24 am
United States to the Federal Circuit; the Blog of Legal Times has coverage. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:14 am
In promoting this goal, the state must not itself become so powerful as to end up dominating some or many citizens (a state dominates a citizen to the extent that it enjoys the unchecked power to interfere in that citizen’s life). [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:22 am
In Anthony Park v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:27 am
IMS Health, he cited United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:15 am
But in Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
Robert V. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:30 am
BackgroundIn Futersak v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:31 pm
The unanimous opinion in Bond v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
