Search for: "Does 1 - 38" Results 3521 - 3540 of 4,952
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2011, 5:30 am by C. Vodzak
Subsection (b) enumerates 38 offenses including “Section 3502 (relating to burglary). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:13 am by emagraken
The defendants acknowledge that there does not appear to be any authority directly on point [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:17 am
The top 1 percent of income earners paid 38 percent of all federal income taxes in 2008, while the bottom 50 percent paid only 3 percent. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:35 am by admin
Note also that New York office does not handle immigrant applications. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is not part of the procedure before the EPO as designated or elected Office and does not give any assessment of whether the requirements of the EPC are met. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ 1529. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ 1529. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:02 am by Lovechilde
  Barry Harris has been described as a "hardcore bebopper" who "is great at what he does. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: We didn’t see a statistically significant swing between asking them 1-5 and after the jury instruction/deliberation. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:58 am by James Hamilton
He said that the rule does not apply to bona fide commercial transactions which do not have as their main purpose the deprivation of the property of one of the parties on bankruptcy. [read post]