Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 3521 - 3540 of 7,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2015, 2:55 am by Lyle Denniston
Plessy’s place in the list of worst Supreme Court decisions Looking back at the Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am by INFORRM
  They carefully considered the historical context of the decision in Wilkinson v Downton. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:31 pm by Giles Peaker
Home being defined as an ordinary english word. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:20 am by Bradley Joondeph
On Monday, a sharply divided Supreme Court held in Comptroller v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:45 pm by Steve Vladeck
But whereas Justice Stephen Breyer’s opinion for the Court in Coleman v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:26 am by Giesela Ruehl
Many state courts still apply the Chevron Oil test regarding their own state laws. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
By 2012, when the current litigation began, it was the largest pay TV operator there, offering around 200 channels in Mandarin and Cantonese, plus a small number of English language programmes — all being delivered by a set-top box. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Blocking injunctions So called “blocking injunctions” under English law have mainly been a feature of copyright law where well-resourced content owners have clubbed together to force internet service providers to the block internet access for pirate websites (See Twentieth Century Fox v BT [2011] EWHC 1981 (Ch) and [2011] EWHC 2714 (“Newzbin 2”) and Dramatico Entertainment & Others v BSkyB & Others [2012] EWHC 268 (Ch)  and [2012] EWHC… [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:39 am
 Recent PatLit pieces review Unwired Planet v Huawei (FRAND and competition law issues held unsuitable for summary judgment) and the award of this year's Prix de thèse Véron & Associés. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
  Aside from the difficulties that Google and other internet intermediaries are having in determining what is inaccurate, out of date and irrelevant, the reported English cases since Costeja, most notably Daniel Hegglin v Google Inc ([2014] EWHC 2808 (QB)) and Max Mosley v Google Inc and Google Limited ([2015 ] EWHC 59 (QB)) have highlighted a very significant tension between data protection law and the law of defamation and other content laws (including Article 8… [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:52 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Garba, Bauchi State University, Gadau (Nigeria)·         Traditio Canonica and Legal Tradition: The Role of the Canon Law in Contemporary Legal Debate, Lorenzo Cavalaglio, University of Udine (Italy)II.B         Interaction and Convergence: Mixed Approaches·         Liability for Losses Caused by Administrative Action in South Africa and the Netherlands,… [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Among the English authorities there were a couple of cases that required particular comment. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:30 am
  The case is called Williams v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 3:09 am
 a trader who directs his advertising at members of the public residing in a given Member State and creates or makes available to them a specific delivery system and payment method, thereby enabling those members of the public to receive delivery of copies of works protected in that Member State, makes, in the Member State where the delivery takes place, a ‘distribution to the public’ under Article 4(1) of Directive 2001/29. [read post]