Search for: "Foster v. US"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 3,571
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2007, 2:00 am
A3659 Kirwan (MS) -- Closes loophole by requiring additional consecutive sentence of five years where a determinate sentence is imposed for criminal use of a firearm in the first degree
No Same as
BLURB : Pen L. addtl min, crim use weapon
First Act: 01/26/07 referred to codes
Last Act: 04/16/07 motion to discharge lost
A4958 Aubry -- Allows the second chance commission upon application to order upon termination of… [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 8:09 am
· US v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
"The most engaging part of the conference was its finale, a moot court re-argument of Scott v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
[See James Lee Clark v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 3:14 am
Court of Appeals, 453 F3d 75 [2d Cir 2006]) that seek to provide a clearer understanding of the criminal liability contemplated by the term "depraved indifference" and thereby to foster appropriate use of criminal charges based upon this theory. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:58 pm
In the US, John Roberts is emphasizing a lot on the virture of unanimity. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 9:24 am
Hallum v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 4:50 am
In Capitol v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 10:09 am
In SONY v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
See Elektra v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 7:32 am
The court in Frazier v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:31 pm
It then applies the diagnostic lens of BOS to the claims in Roper v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 7:12 am
Foster Winans knows insider trading. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 2:12 am
While electronic commerce has flourished with the expansion of the Internet, recent developments in the domain name registration system have fostered practices which threaten the interests of trademark owners and cause consumer confusion. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 7:53 am
Viacom is clearly making its case that Google's actions constitute infringement per the Supreme Court's 2005 Decision in MGM v Grokster, which held that "one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 7:50 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 9:36 am
Whitewater v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:17 am
NXIVM Corp., formerly known as Executive Success Program Inc., runs seminars that some say are intended to foster a cult-like following. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:01 am
[4] Ken Foster, Can Sport be Regulated by Europe? [read post]
