Search for: "German v. German"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 5,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am
” The revelation comes after German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s scathing criticism of NSA surveillance of U.S. allies. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
In practice, the German Federal Regulations concerning both lawyers (s. 43a [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 2:06 am
the answer to question 2 of the CJEU reference made last week in Vereniging van Openbare Bibliotheken (VOB) v Stichting Leenrecht answers the exhaustion question in such a way that it is also applicable here.Thanks so much 'Pacta' for this helpful insight! [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Speaking on 13 January 2014, the European Data Protection supervisor backed German efforts to rebuild momentum towards data protection reforms. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
Is this germane to collective bargaining? [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
The Indian Satellite Saga and Retaliation: Recognizing the Supreme Court of India’s Judgment Abroad?
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm
Sovereign Immunity of India When deciding whether to enforce the CC/Devas (1) award, both the Australian Federal Court and the Superior Court of the Province of Quebec in Canada held that India waived its sovereign immunity by ratifying the 1958 New York Convention because of the “clear and unequivocal submission” in Article 3 of the Convention.[17] When enforcing the DT award, the Higher Regional Court of Berlin held that India did not enjoy sovereign immunity because according… [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In examining the legal reasoning behind the Hong Kong case of Yeung v Google and German case of RS v Google, and comparing the two, this chapter argues that the orthodox approach to fixing responsibility for defamation, based either on the established English common law notion of publisher or innocent disseminator or the existing categories of passive host, conduit and caching in the relevant European Union Directive, is far from adequate to address the challenges brought… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
Union of India (Spicy IP) Indonesia Indonesian government criticised for preferring ‘open source’ software (IP Whiteboard) Netherlands Dutch Court to differ from German Orange Book decision: Micro Fusion 2004-1 LLP v Revenue & Customs Commissioners (ipeg) Relationship between patents and standards – the Dutch case Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications -- epilepsy,… [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
Social Media The German Federal Cartel Office (a competition agency) has opened an investigation into whether Facebook abused their alleged dominant position in social networking by violating data protection laws. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
Cautious Co v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:09 pm
A German publisher purchased all the assets of the Netdokter website from the Austrian company. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:54 am
ZTE [...].a) The Chamber [= panel] outlined its interpretation of the CJEU opinion in Huawei v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:45 am
Ecosystem Alliance v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
German law which traditionally prohibits double protection has now provided for double protection in their new draft legislation. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:28 am
Kraftwerk v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
UPONOR Minn2013http://t.co/T61hjeeHwT -> Joinder in BitTorrent copyright claim ok, TCYK, LLC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]
