Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 3521 - 3540 of 18,401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2020, 1:58 pm by Mark Tushnet
Justice Scalia’s opinion for the Court in MCI Telecommunications v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:59 pm by Denise Maes
President Trump has vowed to only appoint justices that promise to overturn Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
The trial court also reminded the jury that the reasonable doubt standard applied to all parts of the trial and re-instructed the jury on the burden of proof, the presumption of innocence, and reasonable doubt. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am by Florian Mueller
Oracle America (petitioner v. respondent as opposed to plaintiff v. defendant): the Android maker's non-copyrightability defense has a snow flake's chance in hell.I wrote yesterday's triumphant post on the basis of having listened to the hearing on C-SPAN Radio (over the web). [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:07 am by Florian Mueller
But even Justice Sotomayor is at best having second thoughts and far from being totally in the tank for Google on this part.The points that Google's attorney, Thomas Goldstein, made on the copyrightability part were simply ridiculous (he's a fantastic lawyer--the problem is that Google has no non-copyrightability case), and in the first part, every one of the Justices asked questions that suggested a strong inclination to side with Oracle on this part.There was pretty… [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
On the second day of the Supreme Court’s new term, the justices heard arguments in Rutledge v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:27 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Singapore Court has indicated in Re Vanguard Energy Pty Ltd[ii] that the categories of claims for which litigation funding is permitted is not fixed and that so long as the administration of justice and the interest of vulnerable litigants are protected, the categories may be expanded on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:31 am by Joe Consumer
Montana Eighth Judicial District and Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:43 am by SHG
., Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Sam Alito, seized upon the opportunity to present his views on the conflict between religious liberty, a right expressly protected under the First Amendment, and the “right to same-sex marriage,” which he describes as “read into the Fourteenth Amendment” in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:41 am by Susanne Gössl
Against this backdrop, the link between jurisdiction and territorial sovereignty needs to be re-examined. [read post]