Search for: "Law.com"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 14,913
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Norman Siegel, writing at Law.com in January, counted 37 “major” losses, and that was in January, before numerous other rulings that thwarted Trump administration decisions.And he could have observed that all of this is a bit of a surprise. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:54 am
Briefly: At Law.com, Tony Mauro reports that “Justice Anthony Kennedy, who shaped the U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:45 pm
Reasons for judgement were published this week by the BC Court of Appeal upholding a trial judge’s assessment of fault for a pedestrian/vehicle collision. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:23 pm
This week I had the pleasure of discussing the ins and outs of the new ICBC “minor” injury laws and Tribunal system set to hit British Columbia for crashes after April 1, 2019 on Kyla Lee’s Driving Law podcast. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 12:46 pm
Bij gebondenheid aan regels geen beleidsvrijheid Al weer wat jaren geleden schreef ik over tegenstrijdige belangen in het insolventierecht (Tijdschrift voor Insolventierecht 4/2001, p. 115-123). [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm
Reasons for judgement were published today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, striking a jury notice for a personal injury claim with a complex business loss component. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
Following up on last week's post, Harvard Law Students Launch Campaign To #DumpKirkland Over Mandatory Arbitration Agreements For Associates: Law.com, Kirkland & Ellis Drops Mandatory Arbitration for Associates Amid Law Student Boycott: Kirkland & Ellis will no longer require associates and summer associates to sign mandatory arbitration agreements. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:48 am
” Additional coverage comes from Marcia Coyle at Law.com. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Following up on my previous post: Law.com, Ahead of the Curve: A Clinic Rises From the Ashes: Last year, Pepperdine University School of Law developed a one-semester disaster relief clinic to help people impacted by Hurricane Harvey in Texas to file appeals with the Federal Emergency Management Agency when their... [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:55 pm
Reasons for judgement were published today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, assessing damages for chronic soft tissue injuries sustained in a collision. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:10 am
At Law.com, Marcia Coyle reports that “[l]egal scholars, members of Congress and others across the political spectrum have debated the legality of Whitaker’s appointment, and [this] court filing marked the latest challenge to the designation of Whitaker as acting attorney general. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Here’s the Law.com article. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:04 am
British Columbia is not the first jurisdiction in Canada to take away the rights of the public in order to strengthen insurer profits. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:37 am
Finance – Charles Toutant (Law.com) | Published: 11/11/2018 A century-old law barring banks from making contributions to candidates in local and state elections is being challenged by the New Jersey Bankers Association. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Following up on my previous post, Northwestern Law Dean Cites School's 'Difficult Time' As Reason For Faculty Cuts: Law.com, Northwestern Law Is Paring Back Amid Budget Woes. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 6:30 pm
This week the BC Government published more details surrounding their new legal regime for collision victims ICBC alleges to have ‘minor’ injuries. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 12:50 pm
More than one current legal blogger has complained that their contributions to ALM, owner of Law.com, originally free and open on the web, have now been placed behind a paywall pursuant to a business deal between ALM and LexisNexis. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 6:05 am
” [Raychel Lean, Daily Business Review/Law.com, earlier here and here] Tags: antitrust, class actions, McDonald's [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:11 am
” At Law.com, Tony Mauro covers the recent uptick in law firm bonuses for Supreme Court clerks, reporting that “the prevailing hiring bonus for Supreme Court clerks is $400,000—up from $300,000 in 2015,” and that “[i]f the trend continues, the clerk bonus will soon approach twice the annual salary of the justices they work for. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 5:31 pm
Yes, you read that right. [read post]
