Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 4,048
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm
See the analysis by Lord Justice Buxton in McKennit v Ash [2008] QB 73. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:54 pm
The declaratory judgment plaintiff in Au-Tomotive Gold Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:47 am
While the doctrine is often attributed to the 1915 House of Lords decision in Lennard’s Carrying Company v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:50 pm
McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ B1 (29 April 2010) – Read judgment or our previous post Case comment Lord Carey of Clifton, responding to Lord Justice Laws’ observations in MacFarlane, has called this latest dust-up about religion in the courts a “deeply unedifying clash of rights“. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:06 am
For example, in Chester, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2009] EWHC 2923, a prisoner claimed that his rights had been breached as prisoners in the UK are barred from voting in elections. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:27 pm
Circuit in Comcast v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:04 pm
If the answer was yes, then the second issue was whether Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No.3) [2009] UKHL 28 applies in this context so as to require the Home Office to provide a gist of the closed material upon which it seeks to rely to the employee and his legal representatives. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:59 am
The first rule of tax club Filed under: Bully State,WTF? [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The state is under various obligations under Article 2. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:04 pm
In my opinion it is stated briefly and accurately in the following passage in the judgment of Aylesworth J.A., concurred in by Robertson C.J.O., in Woodward v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:36 am
His submission, by David Pannick and David Sherborne, sets out UK authority (such as the the Spycatcher case, Lord Woolf in the Flitcroft decision, the House of Lords decision in Cream Holdings v Banerjee, and the Court of Appeal in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:42 am
415/05 P Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission [2008] ECR I? [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:36 am
The case was referred to the ECJ by the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) in 2008 (M, R (on the application of) v Her Majesty’s Treasury [2008] UKHL 26). [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:22 am
The then Lord Justice Neuberger was one the Court of Appeal judges in the seminal 2005 privacy decision in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
There was already a possession order and, on the state of the law at that time (pre Knowsley HT v White in the House of Lords), there could be no legitimate expectation of getting an assured tenancy as the AST would have been ended. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
There was already a possession order and, on the state of the law at that time (pre Knowsley HT v White in the House of Lords), there could be no legitimate expectation of getting an assured tenancy as the AST would have been ended. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:05 am
Rejecting that request, in McFarlane v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:49 am
The common law has developed a law of privacy without a Human Rights Act in New Zealand, some Australian states and parts of Canada. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:54 am
The case caused a furore as the former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey submitted a witness statement stating that cases such of these should be heard by judges with special religious sensitivity. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:04 am
Delegates involved in these negotiations should start focusing on what amendments to the complementarity provisions or other provisions might be appropriate to signal that aggression prosecutions need not go forward in domestic courts in the event that the Court eventually exercises jurisdiction over the crime.This issue was central to the British House of Lords case of R. v. [read post]
