Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 20,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am
§ 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:07 am
Kluwer IP Law interviewed Bühling on the occasion of the publication of the second edition of the book. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:40 am
Indeed, “[t]o hold otherwise would allow every failed breach of contract claim to morph into a . . . [read post]
30 May 2009, 1:57 pm
Tom B ************’ Word Mark EDGE Goods and Services IC 009. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
Representing Appellee: David B. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
Representing Appellee: David B. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 4:30 am
This is not a matter of reading legislative history but the legislation itself. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
Paragraph (b) of Rule 4:26-2 sets forth the initial procedure that follows when a person is alleged to be mentally incapacitated. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 9:47 am
B. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am
Part 385 Subpart B (“Subpart B”). [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
Reliance on industry is core of Art. 17—cooperation b/t creative industry and platform industry. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:44 am
United States Postal Serv., 756 F.2d 1461, 1464 (9th Cir.1985) (stating test for Rule 41(b), the precursor to Rule 52(c)). [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 10:56 am
The post Why Can’t We Be Friends: Would Lyle Case Decision Be Same Today? [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 10:56 am
The post Why Can’t We Be Friends: Would Lyle Case Decision Be Same Today? [read post]
27 May 2016, 1:30 pm
§ 52B-4(b). [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
First, unlike changing the law or its application which requires all to adjust, only applicants dissatisfied with the status quo would see a change. 85% of office actions don’t even include a PSM rejection I’ve found previously. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:14 am
Newman explained in an email, “[t]he ads that will run won’t offer free, but our visitor won’t know that There should be a decent amount of traffic in this space too. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:41 am
I'm not saying pay them while off, but I am saying save their J-O-B. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:27 am
The USPTO argued that it doesn’t matter if a rule is substantive or procedural and said that the question before the Court is simply whether the Final Rules fall within the expressly delegated rulemaking authority of Section 2(b)(2). [read post]
