Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 3521 - 3540 of 21,685
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2021, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under these circumstances, the complaint states a valid legal malpractice cause of action (see Arnav Indus., Inc. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:47 pm by Florian Mueller
With respect to patents, it's unfortunately also notorious for going off the deep end at times--not all parts of the Lone Star State, but two of its federal districts. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:24 pm by Larry
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:07 pm by Jonathan DeFosse
December 1, 2020 marked the five-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s abrogation of Form 18—the model complaint that provided the minimum requirements for stating a claim of direct infringement. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 2:34 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
App'x 481, 489 (6th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Wilton Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am by Josh H. Escovedo and Zack Thompson
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Ernesto Falcon
The source of this specter lies not in anyone's crystal ball but in the history of U.S. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
  The settlements were announced at a hearing alongside claims by actors Roxanne Pallett, Antony Cotton, Mark and Samantha Womack, Caroline Quentin and her husband Sam Farmer. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 3:42 am by Neil Wilkof
In support of this position, Hallsworth refers to Star Industrial Company Ltd v Yap Kwee Kor t/a New Star Industrial Company [1976] FSR 256, which stated that-- a purchaser of a mark becomes owner of it only if he becomes at the same time purchaser of the manufactory or the business concerned in the goods to which the mark has been affixed. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 3:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Inc., 172 AD3d 1486, 1486 [2019] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
For example, in Tiffany v eBay, Tiffany & Co. sued eBay after filing thousands of take-down notices with eBay for counterfeit jewelry products, claiming that eBay had knowledge of sellers infringing Tiffany’s mark yet continued allowing infringing sellers on their website. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 8:23 am by Jayne Ponder
 As Justice Thomas reflected in his recent statement on the denial of certiorari in Malwarebytes, Inc. v. [read post]