Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 3521 - 3540
of 4,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Thankfully, most observers see it as precisely what enabled long-standing aspiration to be admitted into the realm of actual policy and practice. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
In Buttfield v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Mukasey, Diallo v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 8:31 am
Superior Court opinion in the case, White v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
Thus where two or more factories independently pollute a stream, the plaintiff’s use of the water may be treated as divisible in terms of degree, and may be apportioned among the owners of the factories, on the basis of the respective quantities of pollution discharged into the stream. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:28 pm
For example, in Dana v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
What constitutes effective assistance is not and cannot be fixed with precision, but varies according to the particular circumstances of each case. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
What constitutes effective assistance is not and cannot be fixed with precision, but varies according to the particular circumstances of each case. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:51 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm
In his opinion for the court, Justice Stephen Breyer started with common ground for both sides: the Court’s 1985 decision in Ake v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:22 am
For example, in Ortho Diagnostic v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:31 am
A copy of the District of Massachusetts court’s July 24, 2023, decision in City of Fort Lauderdale Police and Firefighters’ Retirement Systems v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 8:23 am
The second most popular post was a test of the BriefCatch legal editing software using the leaked draft of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am
Shaun discusses the Second Circuit’s decision in Townsend v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:46 am
See Grievance Adm'r v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:30 am
Next term the Supreme Court will hear argument in CFPB v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
All of that was pretty standard stuff - based on R(A) v Lambeth - but a pretty innovative argument was addressed to the CA that previous cases on this point did not take account of the changes introduced in the Homelessness Act 2002. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:31 am
" (See the recent post on Adams v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:17 am
Few of us may consistently live up to the standard, whether on the bench or at the bar. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 6:39 pm
Parts II through V then consider in detail the text and interpretation of the substantive provisions of the UNGP. [read post]
