Search for: "STATE v. SAMPLE" Results 3521 - 3540 of 4,544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
These samples were imported by Sea Port Products Corp. and were produced on November 23 and 24, 2015. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:01 am by Anthony Sanders
Supreme Court later cribbed from him in its famous unenumerated rights case of Meyer v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
Nor could male staff observe female offenders providing urine samples, and observation was necessary to ensure reliability of test results. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am by Dennis Crouch
One could suggest that the Alice v CLS Bank Supreme Court decision also had an impact. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:32 pm by Bill Marler
The outbreak strain was not identified in any of the other samples collected during this EA, although other pathogens of public health significance were detected. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:05 pm by Bill Marler
The outbreak strain was not identified in any of the other samples collected during this EA, although other pathogens of public health significance were detected. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
Thus I consider a sample consisting of people who have rented in the last 10 years or would consider doing so in the future is perfectly reasonable. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am by Bill Marler
The Health Department had by this point in its investigation obtained stool and blood samples from about 50 kitchen-related staff. [read post]